Trump-appointed judge orders Trump admin to ‘turn the funding spigots back on’

Trump’s administration is no secret that secret He doesn’t like pays the money that Congress has approved under Law on Reduction of Inflation and a two -party law on infrastructure. But on Tuesday the federal judge issued order “By demanding agencies to turn funding funding.”

Under President Donald Trump, the Federal Agency used their executive orders to justify the denial of congress approved scholarships and contracts, many of which have already been awarded. But the American District Judge Mary Mcelroy, who was appointed by Trump during his first term, said that the administration procedures were not “either reasonably or reasonably explained.”

“Wide power which [Office of Management and Budget]Who,, [National Economic Council] The director and five claims of the agency have not been found in the Federal Law anywhere, “Mcelroy wrote.

In addition to the Office for Management and Budget and the National Economic Council, as many prosecutors sue five federal agencies. EPA, for example, sue the project of the Action Project in Childhood, which received $ 500,000 to fight the trucking of a childhood in Rhode Iceland. Other agencies include agriculture, energy, housing and urban development and interior.

This case is separated from another, in which Trump administration said Citibank to freeze Hundreds of millions of dollars already holding on bank accounts of non -profit organizations. In this case, the federal judge said that Trump’s administration – especially EPA – acted on a “arbitrary and capricious” way when breaking a contract with three non -profit organizations. The judge issued a temporary restraint order required by EPA -ei Citibank to allow non -profit organizations to access funds in its accounts.

Mcelroy admitted that Trump’s administration was within its rights to direct the country in a certain direction, although there are limitations.

“The court wants to be crystal clear: the elections have consequences, and the president has the right to bring his agenda. The judiciary does not and cannot decide whether his policies are sound,” the judge wrote.

“But where the federal courts are constitutionally needed to weigh – which means that, according to the law, we have no other choice but to do so – cases of” about the procedure “(or the lack of them) that follow in the attempt to adopt these policies.”

Many companies and non -profit organizations have objected to the court supports of the Trump administration control over the departments of executive branches and agencies to undo the effects of legislation adopted and signed by the Congress under the previous administration.

Here, Mcelroy agrees with the prosecutors. “Agencies do not have an unlimited authority for the further president’s agenda, nor have they have an unfinished power of roots in the durability of two statutes that the Congress brought during the previous administration.”