Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Dordash asked a higher court judge in California to dismiss the lawsuit that Uber filed, which accuses the food company of suppressing the competition by intimidating the owner of the restaurant into exclusive contracts.
Doordash claims u His movement There is no merit on this statement on all fronts. On the post on your website On Friday, Dordash said: “The lawsuit is nothing more than a cynical and calculated the tactics of intimidation from a frustrated competitor who wanted to avoid real competition. It is a disappointing behavior of a company that was once known for competitions in the merit of its products and innovations.”
Dordash added in his post that he would “vigorously” defend himself, and he positioned the company as one that “competed fiercely, but rather fair to bring exceptional value to the merchants.”
The hearing was appointed for July 11 in the California higher court in San Francisco County.
Uber filed his lawsuit against Dordash in February. Diva driving alleged Doordash, which holds the highest share of food delivery market in the US, threatens restaurants with multimillioneen penalties or removal or demotation of the company’s position in the Doordash application.
Uber responded to the Dordash request in a statement sent to Techcrunch.
“It seems that the team in Dordash is hard to understand the content of our appeal,” the statement said in a statement from Uber. “When restaurants are forced to choose between unjust expressions or retribution, it is not competition – it is a coercion. Uber will continue to advocate for merchants and equal conditions. We look forward to what we will express in court.”
Uber requested a jury trial in his original appeal. The company did not cite the amount of damage to seek.
Separately, Deliveroo confirmed Friday, which Dordash offered to buy a European Food Delivery Company for $ 3.6 billion.
