Wikipedia Won’t Be Using AI to Replace Humans, Thank Goodness

I can do a lot of things but it’s not good to replace human editors only. The new strategy ai of Wikipedia realizes that, and you will not be replaced the man in the platform at all times.

Wikipedia volunteers are in the support ai

Wikimedia’s foundation announced that will be using ai to build new features. However, these functions had all in the “Studio to create unique opportunities that will ship wikpipedia volunteers”.

In another words, instead of replacing the pupils, and moderators, the news of the volunteer and help the fleeces of the volunteer and build up and build, editing, or updating the entrants of Wikipedia.

Wikipedia wants their volunteers to spend more time on what they want to accomplish instead of concerns about technical details. Activity as translate and turnat on common topics will be automatically, which wikipedia you feel the best fashion shares the local context.

Related

How to become a Wikipedia Editor

Wikipedia is open for updates from all but you have known you can become a publisher? That’s how to become a wikipedia editor.

At a time when I haven’t threatened to impact the human employment, especially of creating content, it’s good to see the screw for their volunteers. You can read the new strategy ai of the foundation Meta-wikibut this announcement extract is sum well:

We believe our future work with you will be successful not only because of what we do, but as we do. Our efforts use our long values, Principlesand policies (as The privacy and it Human rights) As a compass: We will make a human center approach and priorit the human agency; We priory before using the open source or to the open weight; We priory the transparency; And we will prece a munished approach to multilingual, a fundamental part of Wikipedia.

Generative ai is not as good as a human obligation

Widipedia is not the most credible source of information on the internet. But he had human honey, that makes you better compared to only generative solutions, who often will get or do, in my opinion.

Most, if not all, you have tools such as chatgtt, Gemini, and others have re-entering the Internet, and errors in this Dataset leads to the alchestal or give incorrect information. Wikipedia is claiming to be at the “core of each model ai,” what significant needs to ensure information that is made is made up and provide the necessary context.

It was to instruments lacking bloodland creativity, empathy, knowing about context, and reason. These are large tools if you want to seek something or need to analyze a large calculation of calculation. But when you look after, information, and story, have a human look in the text is always the best option better.